|
Basel, 29 April 2005 – The Swiss Bankers Association
(SBA) adheres to the criticism it made in its position paper on official Swiss plans to put the revised
recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF) into practice. In various
areas the official plans go beyond what is necessary and, if implemented, would lead to even more regulations
and an unnecessary weakening of Switzerland’s position as an international financial centre. The SBA
calls for the plans to be reworked in consultation with financial professionals with practical experience
and the Swiss Federal Banking Commission.
The SBA adheres to the
criticisms expressed in its position paper on official Swiss plans to implement the revised FATF recommendations.
The SBA first made its critical position public at a press conference on 10 March 2005. It goes without
saying that an internationally-integrated financial centre such as Switzerland needs a comprehensive
set of measures to fight money laundering. However, the official Swiss proposals to implement the revised
recommendations clearly go beyond what is necessary and demand more than the FATF itself is recommending.
The proposals would simply result in another wave of regulation without any accompanying increase in
security and Switzerland’s position as an international financial centre would be unnecessarily weakened.
Given
that the official Swiss proposals have been criticised by various quarters the SBA now expects them
to be reworked in consultation with financial experts from the affected industries together with the
Swiss Federal Banking Commission (SFBC). For example, classifying insider trading or price manipulation
as predicate offences to money laundering is problematic because it is impossible to estimate the consequences
of such a measure in view of the banks’ surveillance obligations under the SFBC’s Money Laundering Ordinance.
The SBA calls for the draft plans to take this problem into account so that banks are not placed at
any competitive disadvantage. Furthermore, adding professional groups such as art dealers and jewellers
to those subject to the Money Laundering Act in part goes beyond the recommendations of the FATF. The
“regime light” for certain new professional groups does not foresee any supervision of those belonging
to these groups by self-regulatory organisations or by the Money Laundering Control Authority (MLCA).
Responsibility should not be now passed on to the banks and the banks should not be burdened with surveillance
duties in accordance with the SFBC’s Money Laundering Ordinance. In principle, only those professional
groups whose activities have been proven to represent a money laundering risk should be placed under
the Money Laundering Act. Finally, banks and their employees who report suspected money laundering to
the authorities must be protected against reprisals. The SBA demands that information supplied by financial
intermediaries should be forwarded on a restricted basis only. There should be no online access whatsoever
to data lodged with the Money Laundering Reporting Office (MROS).
Note
to the media The speech PDF given by Urs Roth at the 10 March 2005
press conference
contains additional information.
PDF Position paper (in German only)
| Contacts |
|
|
|
| Thomas Sutter |
James Nason |
| Head of Communications Switzerland |
Head of International Communications |
Swiss Bankers Association, Basel |
Swiss Bankers Association, Basel |
| Tel. +41 61 295 92 06 |
Tel. +41 61 295 92 15 |
| Fax +41 61 272 53 82 |
Fax +41 61 272 53 82 |
www.swissbanking.org |
www.swissbanking.org |
|